Legal Actions You Can Take
Citizens have blocked or delayed $64 billion worth of data center projects—and challenged the transmission lines built to power them. Here's how.
In 2023, only 2 data center projects were canceled due to local opposition. In 2024, that grew to 6. In 2025, 25 projects were canceled—21 in the second half alone. Meanwhile, landowners across multiple states are fighting transmission line projects that would cross their property to serve AI infrastructure. This page compiles the legal strategies that have proven effective for both.
Note: This page provides general information, not legal advice. Laws vary by state and locality. Consult a qualified attorney before taking legal action.
Zoning & Land Use Challenges
Most data center projects require rezoning or a special use permit. This is often the most powerful point of intervention—decisions made at the local level, by officials you can vote out. Transmission lines may also require local approvals, though utilities often have more authority to bypass local zoning.
Opposing a Zoning Variance or Rezoning
Before a data center can be built on land zoned for agriculture or residential use, the developer needs approval from your local planning commission or zoning board. You have the right to:
- Attend the public hearing and speak during the comment period
- Submit written objections that become part of the official record
- Organize neighbors to demonstrate community opposition
- Present evidence that the project doesn't meet variance requirements
Transmission Lines and Local Authority
Transmission line projects are often regulated at the state level rather than locally, but there are still intervention points:
- State Public Utility Commission: Most transmission projects require PUC approval—file comments and attend hearings
- Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity: Challenge whether the line is actually needed
- Route selection: Advocate for alternative routes that avoid sensitive areas
- Substation siting: Substations often require local zoning approval even when lines don't
Appealing an Approved Variance
If a variance or rezoning is approved despite community opposition, you're not done:
- Administrative appeal: Appeal to your city council or board of supervisors
- Court challenge: File a writ of mandate in county superior court
- Federal claims: If due process was violated, sue under 28 USC § 1983
What Worked: Peculiar, Missouri
When Diode Ventures proposed a $1.5 billion data center, local group "Don't Dump Data in Peculiar" organized against it. Residents voiced concerns about noise, sight pollution, and property values. By October 2024, the Planning Commission amended the zoning ordinance to exclude data centers entirely—blocking not just this project, but any future data center proposals.
Environmental Laws
Federal environmental laws can require additional review, permits, and mitigation measures—or block projects entirely. These laws apply to both data centers and transmission lines. The key is finding a "federal nexus" that triggers these requirements.
Clean Water Act (Section 404)
If a project involves filling or dredging wetlands, streams, or other "waters of the United States," the developer needs a Section 404 permit from the Army Corps of Engineers. This is especially relevant for transmission lines, which often cross multiple waterways. This triggers:
- Environmental review of impacts to aquatic ecosystems
- Public comment period where you can submit objections
- EPA veto authority if impacts are "unacceptable"
- Mitigation requirement to avoid, minimize, and compensate for wetland loss
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
NEPA requires environmental review for "major federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment." This applies when:
- Federal permit required (like Section 404)
- Federal funding involved
- Federal land affected
- FERC approval required (common for interstate transmission lines)
NEPA review can require an Environmental Assessment or full Environmental Impact Statement, which takes time and may reveal problems the developer would rather not publicize. Transmission line projects crossing federal lands or requiring FERC approval are particularly likely to trigger NEPA.
Endangered Species Act
If a project threatens habitat for endangered or threatened species, it may violate the ESA. Transmission line corridors often cross habitat for multiple species. Citizens can:
- File a petition to list a species present on the site or corridor
- Request critical habitat designation for the area
- Sue to enforce the Act's protections (after 60-day notice)
- Challenge biological opinions that underestimate impacts
Migratory Bird Treaty Act
The MBTA protects over 1,000 bird species. This is particularly relevant for transmission lines, which pose ongoing collision and electrocution risks to birds. Key points:
- Nesting season (March 15 - September 15) is highest risk for construction
- Vegetation removal can destroy active nests
- Transmission lines cause significant bird mortality from collisions
- Mitigation measures like bird flight diverters can be required
Document bird species on the site or along the corridor and report concerns to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Community Benefit Agreements
If you can't stop a project, you may be able to negotiate binding commitments that protect your community. A Community Benefit Agreement (CBA) is a legally enforceable contract between the developer and community groups. While CBAs are most common for data centers, some transmission line projects have also included community benefit provisions.
What Can a CBA Include?
Based on agreements negotiated in 2024-2025, CBAs for data centers have included:
- Water use caps limiting daily or annual consumption
- Noise limits stricter than local ordinances
- Air emissions controls for backup generators
- Local hiring requirements and apprenticeship programs
- Community fund contributions for economic and sustainable development
- Renewable energy procurement commitments
- Operational minimums (the facility must actually operate, not just sit vacant)
What Worked: Lancaster, Pennsylvania
Lancaster's CBA with data center developers included:
- Water-use cap limiting consumption
- Noise and air emissions controls
- $20 million in community contributions—half for economic development, half for sustainable development
In exchange, community groups agreed not to oppose the project.
Leverage Matters
Your negotiating power depends on what approvals the developer still needs:
- Before rezoning: Maximum leverage—developer needs your community's approval
- Before permits: Moderate leverage—you can still delay or complicate
- After approvals: Limited leverage—focus on enforcement of existing conditions
What to Demand
Based on recommendations from Public Citizen and other advocacy groups:
- Prohibit NDAs that prevent discussing the agreement
- Require local hiring with specific percentage targets
- Include enforcement mechanisms with financial penalties
- Set operational minimums so facilities can't sit idle
- Mandate water conservation with specific efficiency standards
- Require renewable energy not just offsets or credits
Noise Ordinance Enforcement
Data centers run 24/7, and their cooling systems produce constant noise—a high-pitched whir and low-frequency rumble that can be heard hundreds of feet away. If a facility violates local noise ordinances, you have legal recourse.
Document the Problem
Before filing complaints or lawsuits:
- Get a decibel meter (smartphone apps work for initial documentation)
- Record readings at your property line at different times of day
- Keep a log of dates, times, and decibel levels
- Note impacts on sleep, outdoor activities, and quality of life
The Low-Frequency Problem
Standard decibel measurements (dBA) don't capture low-frequency noise, which is particularly disruptive and hard to block. Push for:
- C-weighted measurements (dBC) that capture low frequencies
- Ordinance amendments that address data center-specific noise
- Removal of HVAC exemptions that may shield data center cooling
What Worked: Great Oak, Virginia
Residents near Amazon data centers documented noise levels up to 65 dB at night—10 dB over the county limit. After 18 months of complaints and meetings:
- Amazon replaced all 424 rooftop exhaust tubes and fans
- Sound levels dropped to around 50 dB
- Cost to Amazon: reportedly up to $30 million
This demonstrates that persistent, documented complaints can force expensive remediation.
Legal Options
- File complaints with local code enforcement
- Sue for private nuisance if noise interferes with use of your property
- Push for ordinance amendments through your local council
Property Value & Nuisance Claims
If a data center or transmission line harms your property value or interferes with your use of your land, you may have grounds for a civil lawsuit. This is particularly relevant for transmission lines, which can significantly impact property values along their entire route.
Private Nuisance Lawsuits
A private nuisance is an unreasonable interference with your use and enjoyment of your property. Impacts that may qualify include:
- Constant noise from data center cooling systems
- Light pollution from 24/7 security lighting
- Vibration from cooling equipment or substations
- Increased traffic on residential roads
- Electromagnetic fields from high-voltage transmission lines
- Visual blight from transmission towers on your property or in your view
Property Value Diminution
Both data centers and transmission lines can reduce nearby property values. Studies have shown that high-voltage transmission lines can reduce property values by 10-30% for adjacent parcels. Document:
- Appraisals before and after the project announcement/construction
- Comparable sales data showing price impacts
- Expert testimony from real estate appraisers
- Impact studies from similar projects
Property value claims are often paired with nuisance claims in the same lawsuit.
Class Actions
If multiple neighbors are affected, a class action lawsuit may be more effective and cost-efficient than individual claims. Benefits:
- Shared legal costs among affected property owners
- Greater pressure on the defendant
- Comprehensive remedy for the entire neighborhood
Eminent Domain Challenges
Data centers need power—often delivered by new transmission lines that cross private land. Utilities sometimes use eminent domain to take easements from unwilling landowners. You have rights in this process.
Your Constitutional Rights
The Fifth Amendment requires "just compensation" when the government takes private property for public use. You are entitled to:
- Fair market value for the land or easement taken
- Severance damages for harm to remaining property
- Fee reimbursement for certain legal and appraisal costs
Grounds for Challenge
You can challenge an eminent domain taking on several grounds:
- Public use: Is this really for the public, or primarily for private corporate benefit?
- Necessity: Is taking your specific property actually necessary for the project?
- Compensation: Is the offered amount fair market value?
- Procedure: Did the condemning authority follow required procedures?
What Landowners Are Doing
In Maryland, where a 67-mile transmission line has been proposed to serve data centers:
- Public signage: Landowners have staked signs declaring "No eminent domain for corporate gain"
- Official opposition: Officials from three counties have opposed the project
- Legislative action: State legislators proposed the "Protect Maryland Farm Lands Act" requiring 350% of appraised value
- Joint representation: Landowners are pooling resources for shared legal counsel
In Oregon and Idaho, opponents of a 300-mile transmission line are challenging Idaho Power's eminent domain authority before the Oregon Public Utility Commission, arguing the line primarily serves a data center rather than traditional utility customers.
If You Receive an Eminent Domain Notice
- Don't delay—deadlines for response are often short
- Get legal representation experienced in eminent domain
- Get independent appraisals—don't accept the condemner's valuation
- Connect with other landowners on the proposed route
- Document everything about your property's value and use
Investigating Officials
When local officials or utility commissions approve projects that seem to benefit developers more than the community, it's worth investigating whether conflicts of interest, improper relationships, or corruption are involved.
Red Flags to Watch For
- Property ownership: Officials who own land near the proposed site (which may increase in value)
- Campaign contributions from developers, utilities, or related entities
- Business relationships between officials and the developer or utility
- Partial recusals: Officials who recuse from votes but still advocate for the project
- Rushed approvals that bypass normal review processes
- Closed-door meetings that should be public
- Financial ties: Utility commissioners connected to companies they regulate
Where to Report
If you find evidence of corruption or ethics violations:
- State Ethics Commission: Handles conflicts of interest, financial disclosure violations
- State Attorney General: Investigates public corruption, open meetings violations
- FBI Public Corruption Unit: Handles federal crimes including bribery, kickbacks
- Local District Attorney: Prosecutes state-level crimes
- Local media: Investigative journalists can expose wrongdoing
Private Inurement (for Nonprofits)
If a nonprofit organization (like an economic development corporation) is involved in promoting the project, watch for "private inurement"—when insiders benefit personally:
- Excessive salaries to executives or board members
- Insider contracts with businesses owned by board members
- Personal use of nonprofit assets
Report suspected violations to the IRS using Form 13909 (Tax-Exempt Organization Complaint). Your report can be anonymous.
What Worked: Warrenton, Virginia
When Amazon proposed a data center, over 500 residents attended a Town Council meeting. Nearly 130 speakers—including actor Robert Duvall—voiced opposition. Citizens filed lawsuits over withheld emails and appeals processes.
The result: Every town council member who supported the project lost re-election. Starting in 2023 and continuing through November 2024, voters removed the entire pro-data-center council. The newly elected council now has the mandate to block the project.
Public Records Requests
Governments and regulated utilities conduct the public's business, and you have the right to see the documents. Public records requests can reveal what officials knew, what developers and utilities promised, and what deals were made.
What You Can Request
- Development applications and supporting materials
- Correspondence between officials and developers or utilities (emails, letters, texts)
- Draft agreements including PILOT, tax abatement, and development agreements
- Meeting minutes and recordings of planning commission, council, and PUC meetings
- Environmental studies submitted by the developer or utility
- Route studies for transmission lines showing alternatives considered
- Load forecasts showing projected demand that justifies new infrastructure
- Financial disclosures of officials and utility commissioners
How to File
The federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) only applies to federal agencies. For local governments, use your state's public records law:
- Find your state's law: Search for "[Your State] public records request" or "[Your State] open records act"
- Use proper format: Most states have specific forms or require written requests
- Be specific about what documents you want
- Know the deadlines: Agencies must respond within a set timeframe (often 5-10 business days)
If Your Request Is Denied
Agencies sometimes claim exemptions (attorney-client privilege, trade secrets, etc.) to withhold documents. You can:
- Administrative appeal: Challenge the denial through the agency's process
- File a lawsuit to compel disclosure
- Contact journalists who may have resources to pursue the records
In Warrenton, Virginia, citizens filed lawsuits specifically over withheld emails related to the Amazon data center project.
Success Stories
As of late 2025, citizen groups across 24 states have organized against data center projects. Here are some of the victories.
Residents organized against Tract's massive data center proposal, raising concerns about building heights, noise, and utility strain. They pressured local authorities to block rezoning, and the developer abandoned the project in May 2024.
Two lawsuits filed in January 2024 against data centers near Manassas National Battlefield Park resulted in a court ruling voiding the "Prince William Digital Gateway" rezoning. The county must now revote on the entire project.
At a public meeting about an AI data center near Tuttle Orchards, residents raised concerns about impacts on agriculture and local ecosystems. The orchard opposed the project, and following the meeting, Surge Development withdrew its rezoning application.
Despite developer promises to fund half the city budget with environmentally friendly features, town meetings overflowed and feedback ran "999 to one against." The mayor told developers they faced certain defeat, and the project was pulled from the agenda.
Once described as "the state's largest economic development project," this AI data center was dropped by Western Hospitality Partners in July 2025 after facing community opposition.
After residents voiced concerns about energy demand from the 200-acre proposal, city council members moved to pause the project.
The Pattern
Across these victories, common elements emerge:
- Early mobilization—citizens organized before decisions were made
- Mass turnout—hundreds attending public meetings
- Specific concerns—water, energy, noise, property values (not just "we don't want it")
- Bipartisan appeal—opposition crosses political lines
- Electoral accountability—officials who ignored voters lost their seats
Additional Resources
Disclaimer: This page provides general information about legal strategies that citizens have used. It is not legal advice. Laws vary by state and locality, and specific situations require consultation with qualified attorneys.
If you're considering legal action, consult with a lawyer experienced in land use, environmental law, or the relevant specialty for your situation.